Comment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by David Young
Fred, I note that the Lord Gavin has not come to your rescue on this thread despite your desparate pleas. Gavin’s a smart guy, but he has sold his soul to the idea of “communication of science”, a...
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by NW
Of course, on second thought, sometimes simulation methods actually ease the curse of dimensionality, but I mostly know of that in the context of estimation, as with simulated maximum likelihood and...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by manacker
Vaughan Pratt You write to Girma: Of course the HADCRUT3VGL temperature will rise more than 0.06 C between 2011 and 2021. What are you talking about? You’re letting your obsession with WoodForTrees...
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by Peter Davies
Hector you said “Maximum sea levels were a little more than 200m above present level, not enough to “cover all land (except the highest Himalayan peaks)”. If all the land can be seen as it was when it...
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by John from CA
Variations in the Earth’s Orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages A model of future climate based on the observed orbital-climate relationships, but ignoring anthropogenic effects, predicts that the long-term...
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by Captain Kangaroo
Bye, bye Miss American Pie Granny drove the Chevy to the levee but the levee was dry Them good ole boys were drinking whiskey in Rye Singin’ this’ll be the day that I die This’ll be the day that I die...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by manacker
Web I’m beginning to think you have a basic reading disorder. You wrote: Increase of greenhouse gases by 87%? Co2 only has increased by 40%. Notice how Manacker has to stand up for a fellow skeptic no...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Vaughan Pratt
I’m in no hurry. Let’s see how this all pans out once we have the HADCRUT3VGL reading for December 2021. See y’all in a decade’s time.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Vaughan Pratt
Why is it a ‘gotcha’? Lindzen said ‘equivalent CO2′. Are you complaining that he’s wrong? Or that his remark is inconvenient to your ideas? Neither, I’m just pointing out that what he’s attributing to...
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by Brandon...
Peter Davies, some time back I decided something like that would be a great resource for the hockey stick debate, though it couldn’t be an open Wiki. My idea was there would be individual pages on...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Vaughan Pratt
@Friesen But please don’t attack Dr. Lindzen for using a well-established term, I wasn’t, I was attacking him for claiming it was in the IPCC report. A casual reading of the report gives a very...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Brandon Shollenberger
manacker, I think you misspoke: <blockquote>that the <b>temperature increase</b> from the increased concentrations of TOTAL GHGs was around 87% of the <b>temperature...
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by Peter Davies
It would stop the current circular debates that we currently have Brandon and that real progress can be made on a series of specific issues. Agreed that the wikis cant be open to everybody because it...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by manacker
Web I see that Brandon Shollenberger has tried to explain the question regarding the validity of Lindzen’s claim (that the net impact since pre-industrial times of the increases of ALL GHG...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Vaughan Pratt
Oh come on, Matthew, don’t be such a wet blanket. Josh’s cartoons were inspired. I especially liked “Trust me, I’ve been doing this for 4.5 billion years,” which put me in mind of my wish to see the...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by hunter
Dr. Pratt, What is it with you guys and Venus? It is sort of creepy how implying Earth could be like Venus sticks around, no matter the differences that make it impossible.
View ArticleComment on JC interview by hunter
cnp, The logical question your point raises is who kidnapped so many of the scientists out of climate science?
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by robin
I don’t think much of any of it goes to actual research. Oil has had plenty of subsidies with the ‘running out of oil’ boogy man, and then the ‘risk premiums’ due to instability in the ME etc. The more...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by Beth Cooper
Stefan@ 3/12 12.01 Yep! Bob Brown has his own agenda, ‘guilt and maidens,’ (H/T Kim.) Water will be rationed and cost HEAPS. There are lots of trees where I live, Stefan. I guess I’ve planted a small...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by robin
(specifically, the reason there is no funding for ‘skeptical research’ the goal of industry is to have private enterprise subsidized – climate research doesn’t help them much. You have to look at the...
View Article