“Where revenue neutral, carbon taxes lower relative energy prices to the poor…”
So tax the productive and redistribute the wealth to the poor. Now why hasn’t anyone else ever thought of that?
“Carbon based energy is oversubscribed?”
I wonder if even you know what you mean by that. The term “over subscribed” has been used in the context of government programs, some even including energy, but the term “subscribe” is a real word that has an actual meaning, even in that extended context. If you mean “we use to much carbon,” why not just say so (although that too is hardly a new thought)?
However, I must agree that those who have saddled this country with over 14 trillion dollars in debt for their redistributive fantasies, and payoffs to their union campaign contributors, have stolen from future generations. Oh wait, that’s not what you meant is it?
I keep telling myself not to respond to such incoherent, pseudo-economic babble, but sometimes….