Comment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by GaryM
“Where revenue neutral, carbon taxes lower relative energy prices to the poor…” So tax the productive and redistribute the wealth to the poor. Now why hasn’t anyone else ever thought of that? “Carbon...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by Magnus
0926010576.txt * Mann: working towards a common goal 1189722851.txt * Jones: “try and change the Received date!” 0924532891.txt * Mann vs. CRU 0847838200.txt * Briffa & Yamal 1996: “too much growth...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by Coldish
Jeffery and others, the causation of glacial/interglacial transitions is a fascinating topic which well deserves lengthy discussion, but seems to be far O/T for this already oversubscribed post, which...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by Latimer Alder
Clearly your flabber is very easily gasted. I’ve long suspected as much.
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by kai
Thomas, here in Europe, there is a sizable part of the public that DO care about cAGW. Not really about the detailed science behind it, they just want to hear that science says it is true and...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by paul haynes
does anyone know if an attempt at a rebuttle like this exists? Most of the books on the topic (eg Patrick J michaels, Ian Plimer) have been rebutted themselves. I saw a set of YouTube videos by...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by Ferdinand Engelbeen
According to Modtran, the direct effect of 2xCO2 is 0.9°C. With water vapour feedback (quite sure for the lower troposphere, but absent where it matters: at the tropopause) it is 1.3°C. For 40 ppmv...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by AJ Abrams
John N-G “But if we can’t agree on best practices, then the whole thing’s hopeless.” I agree there, but, and this is a huge issue. We are arguing something that is plain as day. If the climate science...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by GregP
Here’s how to build a consensus in the words of Joe Alcamo to Mike Hulme (climategate email here: http://www.climate-gate.org/cru/mail/0876437553.txt): ‘I am very strongly in favor of as wide and rapid...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by QBeamus
Firstly, let me say how much I (and I’m sure others) appreciate your new personna on the Net. I’m not sure what prompted the conversion, but at some level it doesn’t matter. As for the substance of...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline by Latimer Alder
Was there a big warning sign on the graph saying ‘We have mixed up two different bits of data here to give a pleasing and iconic graph, but you should use this with extreme care because it is not...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by David Wojick
Bart, this is a great example of what I call AGW thinking. It invokes equilibrium conditions when the actual climate is a far from equilibrium system. It also refers to the 1000 year temperature record...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by bobdroege
I have a link that shows reconstructions by Mann (08), Loehle (08), Moberg (05) and Ljungqvist (10), http://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?n=394 If there really is a hill of beans difference...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by Jeffrey Davis
The result of experiments and their descriptions stand apart from the efforts to publicize them. If publicity invalidated science, this forum would be empty.
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline by Dana
When has there been “a big warning sign” in any figure in any scientific report ever? We now go back to the same point Gavin was making. You’re holding the IPCC to an arbitrary standard which you do...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by PaulM
Martha, are you trying to “hide the decline” in the public’s belief in man-made climate change? Climate scepticism ‘on the rise’, BBC poll shows Sharp decline in public’s belief in climate threat,...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by Bart R
GaryM By all means, respond to such incoherent pseudo-economic babble. Really. Use some sound economic terms of art. Cite some published, peer-reviewed economists. You seem to believe you’re talking to...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline by Latimer Alder
Take random data – no trends. Put it into Mikey’s Magical Mathematical Mincing Machine. Out pops a hokey stick..maybe not every time, but many times. My man Joe Sixpack says that if the hockey stick...
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline by Lazar
The lesson we have learnt today — if scientists do not put big child warnings on everything, the ‘skeptics’ will PR-spin it like a whipping top.
View ArticleComment on Hiding the Decline: Part II by Latimer Alder
Point of order. GHGs do not produce energy.
View Article