Comment on Psuedoscience (?) by Leonard Weinstein

Judy,
I read the Wikipedia definition of pseudoscience carefully, and it seems to me to fit the more strongly quoted AGW and CAGW claims almost perfectly. I could go through each part in more detail, to show this, but I think you also understand this. However, you and others seem to keep confusing what the skeptics are skeptical of. We do not disagree with recent global warming (and cooling, and other climate variation), and we do not disagree that CO2 and other human caused activity adds some to the warming. It is the magnitude and future trends we are in general disagreement with, based on reality.