Comment on Psuedoscience (?) by plazaeme
And what is “climate science as a whole”? IPCC’s claims, or are you including anything any “denier” scientist may bring on a paper?
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Anders Ottosson
Regardless the vast uncertainties at play, climate science as such isn’t pseudo (nor is the CO2-hypothesis). It is humans that make it pseudo, e.g claiming its results as robust and unquestionable....
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Leonard Weinstein
Judy, I read the Wikipedia definition of pseudoscience carefully, and it seems to me to fit the more strongly quoted AGW and CAGW claims almost perfectly. I could go through each part in more detail,...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Maurizio Morabito (omnologos)
Can we all agree…the bandwagon around climate change science IS pseudoscience. Start from Numberwatch if you think otherwise.
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Willis Eschenbach
jbmckim | March 20, 2012 at 6:23 pm | Reply … It is universally true that any predictive science has a degree of uncertainty associated with it. Surely you can’t be talking about climate science,...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on 21st century solar cooling by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o252/captdallas2/JubanyvMaunaLoaCO2.png The distribution of the nearly well mixed gas is kind of interesting. Comparing Jubany station Antarctica to Muana Loa is...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Herman Alexander Pope
You say: “It does not imply in any way that climate science is pseudoscience” I read what Wiki says about this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience Actual data does not show warming that agrees...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by robin
“When a number of the leading scientists in a field are caught with their hands in the cookie jar and very few scientists in the same field complain or even comment” Ay, that is the key to people not...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by scepticalWombat
As a first guess to your question about Venus I would say that the concentration is not the important thing – the important thing is the total amount of CO2 in the two planets’ atmospheres. So you need...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Professor Bob Ryan
Is climate science more like Freudian psychology than Einstein’s relativistic mechanics? This problem of demarcation between science and pseudo-science is nothing new. Arguably, the best contribution...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Tomas Milanovic
Bart In ordinary usage, quotation marks around a word followed by ‘sic’ in brackets implies literal attribution to a source. I’ve looked so far as I’m able through everything I’ve written since hitting...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Simon Hopkinson
I would argue that no science can be reasonably described pseudo-science unless the balance of its practice is pseudo-scientific or if those within the subject, who do not practice pseudo-science, do...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by cwon14
This is a cousin of the “science” vs. “Anti-science” ad hom. While it leads nowhere it’s interesting Dr. Curry would link it while ducking more obvious politically driven questions that call climate...
View ArticleComment on Letter to the dragon slayers by Doug Cotton
I see Ridley was censored on my dedicated thread on tallbloke which is at least the fourth site to publish my paper.. It’s good to see Nicola Scafetta saying what I have said in my paper about Jupiter...
View ArticleComment on On the adjustments to the HadSST3 data set by Greg Goodman
Hi John, you still seem to be grasping my basic point here. I’ll try to make it clearer. Let’s suppose I found there were some defects in the thermometers used during a particular period, estimated the...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Jim Petrie
I think anyone who assumes that correlation equals causation is indulging in pseudoscience. I have been involved in the area of kidney transplantation for many years. As regards a drug called...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Psuedoscience (?) by Oliver K. Manuel
World leaders secretly agreed to unite nations against “global climate change” in ~1971 in order to save themselves and the rest of the world from the threat of mutual nuclear annihilation,...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Bill
I’m convinced. If I ever get terminal cancer I’ll have someone shoot me. Better survival chances.
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by DocMartyn
Well Mosher, given the daily and annual change in (Tmax+Tmin)/2 is far greater that 0.7C, for all intents and purposes the response should be instantaneous. Moreover, as the postulated effect of CO2 is...
View Article