Quantcast
Channel: Comments for Climate Etc.
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 156787

Comment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by physicistdave

$
0
0

David Springer wrote to me:
>I’m not sure what the proof is, Dave. All I know is that if the mean temperature of the earth cannot exceed 6C with a 1366W/m2 solar constant without violating Kirchoff’s Law.

Well, you have not succeeded in convincing people who know a great deal more physics than you do that this follows from Kirchoff’s law.

And, as you say, you have no proof. Perhaps, if you actually tried to prove your conclusion, using a careful formulation of Kirchhoff’s law, you will discover why your conclusion is not true.

All I can say is that you seem unable to convey to competent scientists why you think your conclusion follows from Kirchhoff’s law.

Until then, it is just your personal belief, without anything supporting it.

Good luck.

Dave


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 156787

Trending Articles