Comment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
‘Sunlight penetrating the surface of the oceans is responsible for warming of the surface layers. Once heated, the ocean surface becomes warmer than the atmosphere above, and because of this heat flows...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
Oh – and the ‘cliché’. I wasn’t talking to you but past you.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by physicistdave
Edim wrote to me: >Dave, it’s too simple (simpletone) and not valid from a physics perspective. CO2 may reduce emmisions from Earth in the IR, but there’s evaporation/convection to balance the...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by physicistdave
David Springer wrote to me: >I’m not sure what the proof is, Dave. All I know is that if the mean temperature of the earth cannot exceed 6C with a 1366W/m2 solar constant without violating...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Fred Moolten
Sorry for being curt, but your first paragraphi is completely wrong.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
Fred, what I describe is just thermo. If you add more energy to a system than is lost by work or entropy, the energy accumulates. If you release more energy than is input, the energy of the system...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Girma
Oh, I forgot the original data => http://bit.ly/HysIA9
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Fred Moolten
Actually, the first two sentences.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Girma
According to the IPCC, last years GMT of 0.34 deg C should have been 0.65 deg C, 0.3 deg C higher (wrong by half the warming of the 20th century!)
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Fred Moolten
You should read the Pierrehumbert article. He disagrees with your figure of 393.6 K and instead cites a value of 800,000 K (after a billion years).
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Edim
What heats the Earth, after it’s reached the Sun’s temperature?
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Jim2
mattstat – That’s a pretty nebulous explanation at best how CO2 affects water vapor.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Girma
Falks The GMT residuals are normally distributed! http://bit.ly/InDiHo
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by climatereason
Beth I have a sister who lives in Adelaide. That could explain a lot. As regards bringing your own drinks, by all means do so but there is a (large) corkage charge tonyb
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
He might want to check his model Even the most massive stars at the origin of the universe are only estimated at 120,000 C. With a perfectly insulated atmosphere, entropy, the escape of highly...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Fred Moolten
Edim – In order to make a point, Pierrehumbert is hypothesizing a scenario contrary to fact – the possibility of perfect insulation against escape of radiation combined with some transparency to...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Fred Moolten
I don’t want to belabor the point, but it’s important to realize that with a potent greenhouse effect, it is possible for radiative equilibrium to be associated with surface radiation far in excess of...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by blueice2hotsea
OMG! Help Bart R! Or please pass the goose sauce.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by climatereason
Bart said ‘The oceans are vast and have room to contain many truths.’ Yes, surely that is so. Having spent quite a few hours in my rowing boat over several months on the ocean 200 yards from my house...
View Article