Chief Hydrologist:
You seem not to grasp the significance of the idea of an independent statistical event for scientific research. The complete set of these events are an example of a statistical population. Events drawn from this population and observed provide the sole basis for the statistical testing of the associated model. For the IPCC climate models, there is no such population. Thus, these models are non-falsifiable and unscientific. To state, as you did, that these models make predictions is to falsely imply that non-falsifiable and unscientific models are falsifiable and scientific.