Comment on The legacy of climategate by WebHubTelescope
That’s kerogen. You lose. Peak oil concerns oil not kerogen.
View ArticleComment on The legacy of climategate by omanuel
The legacy of Climategate e-mails and documents of 2009 can be traced to <i><b>surprising events</b></i> sixty-four years (~64 yrs) earlier (2009-1945 = 64): <b>August...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
Web, I agree that Bartemis is incorrect, however your equatorial oceans driving the mauna loa annual cycle is also incorrect. The annual variation at Mauna loa is a touch more complex than your...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Terry Oldberg
Girma: Thank you for giving me the opportunity to clarify. The IPCC models are not predictive models. Thus, when climatologists such as Kevin Trenberth state that the models make no predictions, they...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Paul S
Capt. Dallas, I’m not sure what you’re trying to demonstrate with your graphs. You’re showing temperature graphs with annual cycle removed against Mauna Loa CO2 data with annual cycle intact.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by TerryMN
The dog is sitting in the back of the truck.
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
That was just for Web, what I am doing is comparing Mauna Loa annual deviation from mean, the AM signal, to regional temperature variation from mean. That enhances the signal so you can better see what...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Eli Rabett
The annual variation in [CO2] is from the greening of the Northern Hemisphere during summer. Most of this later decays away (and you sweep up the leaves). This is not seen in the Southern Hemisphere....
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Eli Rabett
Yeah, after you eliminated most of the 80 ppm or so increase in CO2 concentrations by taking the derivative. In any case, most of the rise that you are looking at in the d[CO2]/dt line is the non...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
Eli Rabbet is exactly right, the majority of the signal is from the greening. When I remove the greening signal it gets more interesting. There is some southern ocean impact and the multi-year ENSO....
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Girma
Terry We are on the same side. Wish you a good journey. My main beef with the IPCC is it reported a global warming rate of 0.2 deg C per decade, but this warming rate includes a transitory warming rate...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Steven Mosher
David, If you want to do it right ( I used to draw these as a kid in the late 60s) you basically want to create a huge virtual canvas of the entire tree and then you can pan/zoom etc on the section you...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Paul S
OK, I think I’ve figured out what you’ve done – you’ve effectively used the ‘seasonally-corrected trend’ column of the Mauna Loa data (though I think you’ve taken a longer route to effectively doing...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by willard
NARRATOR could belong to an ad by the Heartland Institute. We’d need to check to video to validate this hypothesis.
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by jim2
It’s easier to say you can predict what will happen in the 2050′s, but of course, you will have to wait a long time to know if you actually can or not. This idea of Ms. Pope’s reeks of hubris.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by John Costigane
David, Binary trees in database design allow fast access to data records since they avoid the slow sequential checking of all records otherwise required. I think this is the basis of your design as...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Peter Lang
John Costigane and David Wojick, That is what I’d really like to see. Can either of you point me to an ‘Issue Tree’ for the climate debate, or anything else that tackles this? I’ve just seen this World...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Terry Oldberg
Chief Hydrologist: You seem not to grasp the significance of the idea of an independent statistical event for scientific research. The complete set of these events are an example of a statistical...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by WebHubTelescope
Bartemis was the one claiming that all of the co2 increase was due to elevated temperatures — degassing or outgassing as material scientists typically call it. I am just saying the small ripple on the...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Bart R
[This is identical to my conclusion] No, Mr. Orssengo. Your conclusion is that you are 100% without doubt of cooling for the next two decades. Remember, you said so just a day or two ago? Dr. Swanson...
View Article