Comment on Letter to the dragon slayers by JWR

Phil
I see a certain agressivity in your answers.
In fact the wires of my chicken gauze are black, and they have eps=1.
the factor “f” is just a ratio of surfaces.
The eps which is introduced gives the possibility that not only the wires emit but also the holes with O2 and N2.That effect is very small and in the runs eps is always taken as eps=1.
But Phill, why are you that agressivity, do you want that there is back radiation. There is not, as you can read in the paper.
Stefan BOltzmann is to be applied on pairs.
Let me take an example of daily live.
You love you wive very much, say infinitely much.
Her mother loves her also very much, say infinitely much.
But those two facts do not say anything about the relation between you and your mother in law.
And that is exactly what you do, calculating the flux from T1 to zeroK, and calculating the flux from T2 to zeroK, and you claim to have found the relation between T1 and T2.
No, there is the 2nd law saying that heat is going from warm to cold, and I put in my balances only the net flow. As simple as that. I get equations and I solve them. And the results are coherent.