These must be “advocates” Martha, what kind are they?;
Christian Science “advocates”? No, I don’t think so.
Animal rights “advocates”? No, I don’t think so.
States rights “advocates”? No, I don’t think so Martha.
Eco-left, radical pro-warming advocates Martha? Is it really that hard to admit? You’ve buried yourself in the most sort of denial and one that is made for a distorting purpose. Take your EU socialist blathering to another post, we can expect no contribution or logical admissions from you. You live in a fantasy world and your distraction is an admission of your bias and embarressment which should really be shame. Your worse than a Gaianist Martha by a long shot, you’re a hardcore Greenshirt with nothing to say. The lowest on my list of social sterotypes found here;
A. Gaianist- think smoking pot at an Earth day rally listening to the Grateful Dead and babbling about going back to nature before they drive their Subaru back to home they inherited.
B. Zombies- The working tools who accept the party line on most anything including warming propaganda with little thought. Often with willful little thought but they know doctrine and can actually be naive in real life.
C. Greenshirts- Know better (sometimes, I’m talking about how phony their own talking points really are), meaner and far more corrupted. Crave money and or authority in large quantities. The lowest on my list. It’s from this pool that will require jail sentences and social vilification.
You are a definate type “C” Martha.
No need to whine for reinforcements Martha, speak for yourself. Inane as that may be.