Comment on Discussion with Rich Muller by cheap tyres glasgow
Definitely consider that that you said. Your favourite reason appeared to be on the internet the easiest factor to take into account of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed at the same time as...
View ArticleComment on Not 100% sure? by TomFP
Max, good post, but I was puzzled by your statement that risks ““perceived directly”, and those ”perceived through science” were essentially the same category. Surely the first category includes all...
View ArticleComment on 2 perspectives on communicating climate science by WebHubTelescope
Thank you for attempting to police your own. You mention clowns, I can’t even put cwon on the clown list because his is empty rhetoric and doesn’t have what it takes to present an alternative model....
View ArticleComment on Not 100% sure? by cwon14
Max, I’ve heard all this before. The science nuances are beaten to death here, they are interesting at times but we are talking about very small variations in a real world where it could always be...
View ArticleComment on Not 100% sure? by Martha
The content of the post raises questions about contemporary modes of power influencing the harmful polarization of many issues. Unfortunately, the domination of this thread by Cwonism is not value...
View ArticleComment on Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in...
I know perfectly well that it appears useless to argue with your views on the net. There isn’t slightist hope that either one of us would tell openly that he has changed his mind to the least, but I...
View ArticleComment on Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in...
the need is in the ability to use any theory in accurate understanding of a very complex system. The system is complex, because it’s large, consists of very many processes, is influenced by complex...
View ArticleComment on Not 100% sure? by Bad Andrew
“I’d give her the benefit of the doubt – as I think she can do more good for exposing the real truth as a questioning insider than as a challenging outsider.” There is no evidence to support this...
View ArticleComment on Not 100% sure? by cwon14
These must be “advocates” Martha, what kind are they?; Christian Science “advocates”? No, I don’t think so. Animal rights “advocates”? No, I don’t think so. States rights “advocates”? No, I don’t think...
View ArticleComment on Climate Classroom by markus
That took me exactly 176 secs to read that tome and 1 second to say. “The latter implies that certain general principles that are almost universally accepted by the knowledgeable scientific community...
View ArticleComment on Climate Classroom by manacker
Cap’n, you’re right – the numbers are screwy. World gasoline consumption in 1986 was 15.4 million bbl/day (in 2007 it was 21.8 million bbl/day)....
View ArticleComment on Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in...
Interesting, that you would probably insist climategate emails would be taken out of context, but you have fully conceptualized my separate posts into one. Something does not square with those two...
View ArticleComment on Questions on research integrity and scientific responsibility by...
Eli Rabbet no, no, no, you are the confused one; because this time you got the carrot, from the other end. Ridiculing me is easy, because of my limited English vocabulary. But ridiculing me is;...
View ArticleComment on Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in...
“Yes, that sentence parses, and the grammar is correct, so I understand that it is a statement of some sort” Excepting, he knows that the predictive relevance of my syntax is false.
View ArticleComment on Nonequilibrium thermodynamics and maximum entropy production in...
Pekka, I do agree that it will break down at the most coarse-grained level — as you say the handful of oceans and continents do create that last bit of determinism that cannot be modeled...
View ArticleComment on Climate Classroom by Anteros
markus/Fred - I was struck by the same sentence - <blockquote>“The latter implies that certain general principles that are <b>almost universally accepted</b> by the knowledgeable...
View ArticleComment on Climate Classroom by Fred Moolten
Anteros – thank you for specifying where you disagree with the principles I described. That will allow intelligent readers to make a judgment on those principles. I will be happy to see that happen.
View Article