Comment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Bart R
johanna | March 19, 2012 at 6:57 pm | Bart, your thinking is so muddled and tangled it is hard to know where to start. It is like the contents of a 10 year old’s knitting basket. Believe me, johanna, I...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by hunter
lolwot, Reading a hack true believer trying to dismiss the problems of the AGW dogma is not really effective anymore. But your faith earns you a gold star- and a brown nose.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Bart R
NW | March 19, 2012 at 10:09 pm | Bart, I think that you fundamentally misunderstand what ‘economic scarcity’ is and is not. I live to be enlightened. Let’s see if I can keep up with your lessons. When...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by mike
Well, Bart, the best I can say is that you didn’t show up at this blog in boots and with a whip in hand for your big, “Speckled Hen” moment. I mean, Louise can get away with that sort of thing–but not...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Bart R
JamesG | March 19, 2012 at 3:06 pm | This signatories said that? “Give us money.” Can you point to a source? Citation? Something signed by all 194 signatories with those words in it? Or are you making...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Bart R
maksimovich | March 18, 2012 at 3:27 am | Given that there is no sign this will happen, do you have a practical solution that could?
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by NW
Bart, I’ve just tried to get the economics straight in this discussion, without taking a position as to whether or not there are net positive or negative effects of CO2 disposal or what their size is,...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Beth Cooper
Reply to Bart @9.45pm ?9.47pm. Bart, I’ll discuss the Austrians at a later data,…much later. Re the immediate, Bart: Your You tube scenario from the Climate Reality Project is exactly what I mean....
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by cwon14
http://joannenova.com.au/2012/03/conspiracy-theorist-just-another-form-of-namecalling-from-the-class-who-want-to-be-global-rulers/ EU greens pushing “World Parliament”. If you oppose you must be a...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Jim D
Eerily similar to Lindzen’s mistake in his Parliamentary speech, pointed out by Gavin at Real Climate. He used a GISTEMP Met station (land) index as current and the global GISTEMP LOTI index as past...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Peter Davies
While I am not into counting posts the numbers seem to be made up by only a handful of posters of whom Bart would go close to half.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Jim D
I called Willis out on his WUWT thread on this last week. I said something to the effect that everyone knows volcanoes increase the albedo, and I think he wanted to say something like only before they...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Jim D
Should be …only before they decrease it again…
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Beth Cooper
Thank you Chief Hydrologist. Cervantes is wonderful. Just reading his preface reveals how acutely he is aware of the shifting mix of imagination, fiction and fact with which we see the world and...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by David Jay
Willis: This is the line from the thread that caught my attention: “conducting climate model experiments”
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Simon From-Sydney
When a hypothesis is unfalsifiable, that renders it pseudoscientific. Therefore if, when any weather event occurs, it is claimed by climate scientists to be “consistent with” climate change, such a...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Hector M.
In the case of climate science, one major flaw is that most mainstream climatologists have started with a working hypothesis (namely, GHG cause global warming) and all their efforts thenceforth have...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Chief Hydrologist
‘How many parameters? Give me four parameters and I’ll draw you an elephant: give me five and I’ll waggle its trunk.’ attributed to Linus Pauling Atmospheric and oceanic simulations cross the line into...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by jbmckim
There’s a bit of either/or fallacy in the idea that climate science is “either” pseudo science “or” it’s not. I believe it muddies the water a good bit to leave the formulation of the issue there. It...
View Article