Comment on Nuclear power discussion thread by Herman Alexander Pope
All the examples we need are the subsidies and tax credits and laws and rules that favor renewable energy that cannot compete in a fair and honest market and cannot deliver a reasonable fraction of...
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by Agnostic
In addition to the interesting history of Thorium Fission: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molten_salt_reactor …the Bussard Polywell inertial electrostatic confinement fusion reactor:...
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by David Springer
“Experiments to test our theories and hypotheses are conducted by the Earth itself.” In other words control of variables is out of your control. That makes it something other than an experimental...
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by David Springer
The basic problem with climate science is a number of practitioners want the most consequential conclusions to be accepted like those conclusions were the result of real experiments when in reality...
View ArticleComment on On the adjustments to the HadSST3 data set by Bart R
Greg Goodman Taking into account the clear indications in the data that it is not very nice, acknowledging the limits of the tool I’m using, but hoping to clarify a bit, and I hope bring me back to...
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by omanuel
No, David, I meant neutron repulsion. That is the form of energy that powers the universe as it expands and fills interstellar space with H and He [1]. The Sun produces H and He too, and discharges it...
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by omanuel
Typo correction: The entire universe consists of two forms (compacted or nuclear) and (expanded or atomic) of one fundamental particle [2]: The Neutron Hydrogen atom (p+ and e-) _Compacted Expanded
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by omanuel
Try again: The entire universe consists of two forms (compacted or nuclear) and (expanded or atomic) of one fundamental particle [2]: The Neutron Hydrogen atom (p+ and e-) _Compacted Expanded
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by omanuel
Last try: The entire universe consists of two forms (compacted or nuclear) and (expanded or atomic) of one fundamental particle [2]: The Neutron Hydrogen atom (p+ and e-) _Compacted Expanded
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by omanuel
Never give up! The entire universe consists of two forms (compacted or nuclear) and (expanded or atomic) of one fundamental particle [2]: The Neutron; The Hydrogen atom (p+ and e-) _Compacted; The...
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by Wagathon
There are a few AGW alarmists who are hypocrites when they pretend to wish for a better world by returning America to a society based on hunting and gathering. Those few are people like Al Gore...
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by Edim
Agree, geothermal flux (and its variation) is significant. The average geothermal flux is not only the heat conduction (which is low), but also a lot of convection (vents…).
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by kim
What I find fascinating, Wagathon, is the borderline between true belief and cynical belief among the alarmists. I find the former territory to have a much higher population than the latter, and I find...
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by omanuel
I just received information on another report of the Sun’s pulsar core: V.A. Kotov, “A pulsar inside the Sun?” Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics 39, 811-814 (1996)....
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by physicistdave
David Wojick wrote to me: |>I see no such general claim in his statement, such as you allege. Well, David, Veritas did write: >>positive/negative feedback, resulting in warmer/cooler temps....
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by Arno Arrak
Thanks for the kind words, Peter. You are right about the paradigm behind CO2 based AGW. Unfortunately their propaganda machine is able to suppress mention of any competing explanations. Take Miskolczi...
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by NW
GeneDoc, Economists can do controlled experiments. I do them. The real problem for us is finding “invariant conceptual objects”–that is, things like fundamental constants, or even distributions of...
View ArticleComment on NRC’s artless untruths on climate change and food security by Manniac
Got anything more than snark, Mr Scrooge?
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by physicistdave
tomfop wrote to me: >I have characterised this elsewhere as “the perverse extension of uncontroversial science”. Do you agree? Yeah, I think I do. Some people on this thread have made unjustified,...
View Article