Comment on Psuedoscience (?) by Bill
Both Mosh and I are luke-warmer skeptics (if I can speak for him). He is an author on some of the BEST papers under review right now. I am a physical scientist. 1 through 3 are true. 3 is based on...
View ArticleComment on On the adjustments to the HadSST3 data set by John Kennedy
Hi Greg, I think we might have to agree to disagree about the implications of your analysis. The metadata are far more complete than your description of them allows. They show changes in the observing...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Bill
Or his apparent inability to use Excel OR ANY OTHER GRAPHING PROGRAM to fit a straight line and get the slope!! I have not seen this disputed anywhere. In the e-mails released a few months ago he was...
View ArticleComment on Psuedoscience (?) by Bill
Because she saw a few interesting articles she liked and is tired of people on both sides throwing out the term “pseudoscience”??
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by Anteros
Joshua - It will always look the same if you look at it in the same way. A slightly changed perspective may reveal surprises and wonders.
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by Chad Jessup
Interesting post. I always wondered about the science behind nuclear winter, but it seemed to me that it constitute a secondary concern here, because the radiation fallout that would ensue from a...
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by SOYLENT GREEN
Seems apropos a year later. http://sonofsoylentgreen.wordpress.com/2011/03/13/because-the-greens-will-further-demonize-nuclear-power/
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by Don B
Backup power needs to be located off-site.
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by Girma
I am comparing the above 0.06 deg C per decade warming with the following statement of the IPCC: IPCC: For the next two decades, a warming of about 0.2°C per decade is projected for a range of SRES...
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by diogenes
total non sequiturs everywhere…commercial nuclear power (outside the USSR where no one bothered about proletarian lives) the accident rate is startlingly low. Compare with lives every year lost in...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Chief Hydrologist
You are just going to talk to people you can either bully or just ignore you? My life is so much poorer.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/16/12 by Chief Hydrologist
Threading. !!! – Bart was threatening to ignore me above. While I am here we have several propositions. All of them ill-defined but definitely capitalism and not taxes – except for British Columbia...
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by aletho
… Nuclear weapons programs rely on the existence of large nuclear processing facilities including mining, milling and enrichment of uranium as well as a highly specialized and experienced labor pool....
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by DocMartyn
‘Trenberth, is the “two index finger hunt and pecker” typist.’ Seriously?
View ArticleComment on Nuclear power discussion thread by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
Lost in which mines? The number of lives lost in China per year is three orders of magnitude greater than in the US per year. In the US, miners, demand safe working conditions, OHSA regulates safe...
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by HR
Pokerguy, your rigorous analysis has failed to convince me.
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by DocMartyn
“David Wojick Kuhn’s point against Popper is simply that the journals are not full of falsifications. ” They are if designed, written and review properly. Pretty much every figure I present has a...
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by DocMartyn
Michael Larkin, I am quite prepared to take a bet. I will inject or snort the postulated trigger identified by the ‘HIV-not cause of AIDS’ crowd, as long as I get to inject HIV into their blood stream....
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by kim
I stand by it as a theatrical science. ====================
View Article