Comment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by Doug Badgero
Turk Plant. Status available here: https://www.swepco.com/info/projects/TurkPlant/Default.aspx They expect to start up late 2012.
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by DocMartyn
Chris, why should we respect your numbers here when you can’t defend for numbers in your paper? Please do explain where the numbers for the Trenberth-style Energy Diagram come fro? What bit of the...
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by manacker
Chris Colose “Every little bit helps”. Or does it? Thanks for elaborating your personal belief on the impact of the announced EPA regulation. You say that whatever EPA does, it will make mo difference...
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by mike
lolwot, Yr, “The problem is cwon didn’t get the memo.” Oh yeah! cwon didn’t get the memo? You don’t say, lolwot. Well, then, make sure, lolwot, to give cwon a copy of “the memo” the next time you bump...
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by Ross Cann
The link says the plant is now 80% complete. I am talking about plants with no construction started until 2013. There are a number of of existing coal fired plants converting to gas.
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
That is not a fair bet for you. The permitted plants that break ground in the next year are grandfathered into the existing category.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Bart R
For more about a little bit of research on soil microbes and CO2 levels. //www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0021377 I love the tagline of this site: Accelerating publication...
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by Tom
Zorba the Geek? Mr. Chris Colose,…’I don’t have much insight into the politics,,,,’ “What’s the use of all your damn books? If they don’t tell you that, what the hell do they tell you? They tell me…...
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by Doug Badgero
OOPS, my bad. You may be correct, but that is kinda the point of the proposed regulation isn’t it? You can’t roll the dice with a multi-billion dollar investment and environmental NGOs know that.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Jim Cripwell
Try again to get this at the bottom. Let me put this at the bottom of the discussion, where I hope it will be noticed. “Bart R | March 29, 2012 at 1:47 am | Signal may be “hunch”, “indication”,...
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by Bill
The sad thing is that this would have been a great illustration of the power of the market. Coal would have gone down naturally due to its higher cost compared to natural gas. Some of those higher...
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by hunter
Bart R, Your obvious lack of experience is showing.
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by hunter
Bill, You miss the point that the envirocrats are going to kill off gas and frakking next.
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by hunter
R. Gates, The writing on the wall is that the consensus was wrong and that some of the consensus promoters were lying.
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
The evirocrats seem to think they can drag and drop any solution they wish.
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by Rob Starkey
It will be interesting to see what rationale the EPA uses to justify the specific CO2 emissions standards that are established. What will be the basis for whatever standard is ultimately established....
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by Rob Starkey
R gates I disagree with your comparison to teens smoking. In that case there are undisputed harms to the individuals. In the case of emitting CO2, the are definate benefits that come about from the use...
View ArticleComment on Pseudoscience (?) by blouis79
Dave, Actually it is the majority of “climate scientists” arguing with words, failing to describe a real physical process, debunked by Gerlich and Tscheuschner and Kramm and D’Lugi, failing to...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/23/12 by Bart R
Jim Cripwell | March 29, 2012 at 7:18 am | More precisely, there are infinitely many climate sensitivity figures, varying with the time and the time scale selected. Do the calculation yourself. Extract...
View ArticleComment on U.S. greenhouse gas regulations by RiHo08
I slept on it and awakened to my errors. Beltway not Beltline March 2, 2011 not Feb 3, 2011
View Article