Comment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by miker613
Shredded? Maybe you didn’t read Dyson’s original review, which was about sequestering CO2 with plant life. Which is what he said. It sounds as though May was just confused. In any case, you’re changing...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by jim
Bart, A big difference between the hard sciences and economics, that I see, is that the practice of science seldom needs compulsion of people. All the practice of economics in our history has as some...
View ArticleComment on Authority(?) in political debates involving science by Pooh, Dixie
In response to Brown’s speech, which I just read. (On pure democracy) “A common passion or interest will, in almost every case, be felt by a majority of the whole; a communication and concert result...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by blueice2hotsea
WHT- [Dyson] tries to rationalize by suggesting that he was talking about residence time in another context, that of artificially sequestering CO2 with additional plant life. Tries to rationalize?...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by hunter
billc, You restate my main point well. The models are not working, the people using the mdoles are shown to be massaging data and hiding inconvenient digressions from their models, and hiding this. AGW...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by hunter
Scott, LLL and others have been promising fusion energy in a few years for about 60 years. I doubt if fusion is any closer now than it was decades ago.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by hunter
WHT, You are pooping in your own nest when you asert someone has shredded Dyson.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by kim
The Ents march with Dyson. =======
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by WebHubTelescope
This is odd. Explain the high percentage of fruit loops from Australia appearing here. Its kind of hard to miss the fact that Chief Kangaroo, Girma, Doug Cotton, StefTheDenier, Fitzhenry, Ian, now...
View ArticleComment on Authority(?) in political debates involving science by...
You guys deserve each other. There you have Norm explaining the GHG theory in a perfectly acceptable fashion, and then he goes ahead and denies it is occurring. Climate scientists agree that H2O has a...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Wagathon
The DICE model? That’s ridiculous! Monkeys throwing darts would be a lot more scientific than Mann.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by David Young
I agree with the comments of others here that to say that models merely solve the fundamental conservation laws of physics is very deceptive. It’s a gloss on the truth which is that you must transform...
View ArticleComment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by do you get your period when your...
Thank you for all of your efforts on this website. Kate enjoys carrying out internet research and it’s simple to grasp why. Most people notice all regarding the compelling mode you create simple things...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
Again this violates blog rules being contentless drivel. Add some content and I will address the issue and not the person. Just like I did here....
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by David Young
Peter, Webby is a little bit testy from time to time. His problem is that he doesn’t know that some of us actually have real credentials and experience and are much better trained than he is. Alas, we...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by maksimovich
leaving aside for the moment the climate physics,the first non trivial problem is how robust is the intergration of economic classical theory into a coupled model. If the so called growth model is so...
View ArticleComment on Authority(?) in political debates involving science by...
“Judith – I call this a contentless diatribe and insist it be removed. http://judithcurry.com/2012/04/03/authority-in-political-debates-involving-science/#comment-190342 It is obviously a violation of...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
This is typical – I quote Chris Colose to Webby to try to educate him on some simple radiative physics – and away from the serious nonsense of Bos-Einstein boson statisitics, the old delusion of these...
View ArticleComment on Meteorological March Madness by WebHubTelescope
The T^4 coefficient and term has to be replaced with the full spectrum profile because Bose statistics are no longer analytically expressible with all the notches due to the GHG concentrations.....
View Article