Comment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
I think you can tell by the content David. Bose-Einstein boson statistics keeps is amusing me lately. The comment I link to above uses a novel concept of statistical mechanics – instead of a far more...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by thisisnotgoodtogo
“My wife, a biologist, once asked a friend who was a mathematician how to calculate the area of a cell membrane from some electron microscope data she had.’ Dave, might this work ? How about enlarging...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by WebHubTelescope
Robert May is discussing the issue of adjustment time versus residence time of CO2 concentrations. A short residence time is likely but the adjustment time is very long. Dyson didn’t discriminate...
View ArticleComment on Authority(?) in political debates involving science by...
There is an interesting physics newsfeed/blog called http://physorg.com, which Oliver kept on spamming with his nutso ideas. As of late last year, he disappeared because apparently he couldn’t take the...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by jim
What is “…privatizing the carbon cycle” ?? What is it??
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by jim
Can Nordhaus or anyone, anyone, else propose a do-able means to ban fire and combustion world wide? Absent that, all else is word play and number play.
View ArticleComment on Aerosols and Atlantic aberrations by climatereason
R Gates said; ‘In general though, I think the evidence is getting stronger and more persuasive that aerosols have played a big role in driving the AMO (both natural and anthropogenic), and that...
View ArticleComment on Aerosols and Atlantic aberrations by climatereason
Handjive Thanks for those references. I will look up the paper you cite. We have some good records of that general period and area. I wrote about some of them here. “The rise of Rome coincided with the...
View ArticleComment on Aerosols and Atlantic aberrations by Punksta
GaryM, you meant “And the heat goes on” , surely ?
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by kim
Yep. Think what they could have done had they followed science instead of yielding to the influence of politicians, the money men. Sit on the waterfront long enough, you’ll see the bodies of your...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by jim
Doc, “your description > your remarkable description”
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by jim
Bart, ‘Economics in the Trenches 101a – Trade or crime?’ Some economists recognize this: ‘Your Need and The Cost to Satisfy Your Need.’ 1) You need something, you make it yourself. Opportunity Cost vs...
View ArticleComment on Aerosols and Atlantic aberrations by Edim
There’s a very good correlation between the AMO and solar cycle frequency or solar cycle length (inverse correlation). Figure 1 here: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1202.1954v1.pdf It looks like the AMO shape to...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by jim
Example: Gleick blows-up his carer and AG Warmism to reveal the Heartland boogeymen are funded by the Power Strip Industry. So very much lost for such little gained. Churchillian heroism in reverse....
View ArticleComment on Aerosols and Atlantic aberrations by Stacey
“the Atlantic regional climate is more pervasive than previously thought.” Well this really is an original paper with a really original statement as above? Unfortunately they missed out the beginning...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
I think that’s that’s Dr. Orssengo.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Peter Lang
Read the original post for the source of the $1.35 trillion. Read the other posts and make an attempt to understand. You have convinced me you are a loud-mouth, bombastic ideologue, with nothing ov...
View Article