Comment on Climate science in public schools by lolwot
“Matthews’ calculation is off by a factor of 2 to start off with.” Does he? Are you sure about that. I would think he’s factored that in already.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Climate science in public schools by Bart R
David Wojick | May 13, 2012 at 7:21 am | “You would rank such a teacher as crazy. The obvious difference is that climate change really is controversial. Our 200,000 comments here are ample evidence of...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Bartemis
“The adjustment time constant for CO2 sequestering is huge (100′s to 1000′s of years) and it acts as a great integrator.” Calculate the dc gain for that!
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Bartemis
No, it gives a narrative. A narrative, no matter how seemingly plausible, is nothing without proof.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by lolwot
If Canada emits at 2005 levels for the next 100 years that’s 73 gigatons of CO2 emitted (730 megatons per year x 100) Whereas if Canada reduces emissions by 17%, that’s 61 gigatons of CO2 emitted. 73...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Bartemis
It never fails to amaze me how certain people can be about things with little or no corroborating fact. Confirmation bias appears to be hardwired into human brains.
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Jim D
It gives a carbon budget that can be closed without introducing any implausible terms or chemically unbalanced conditions.
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Bartemis
<a href="http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2/derivative/mean:24/scale:5/offset:-0.4/plot/gistemp/from:1959" rel="nofollow">Bottom line, guys</a>. No matter what you believe, reality...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Bartemis
Which is incompatible with <a href="http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/esrl-co2/derivative/mean:24/scale:5/offset:-0.4/plot/gistemp/from:1959" rel="nofollow">this</a>. Data wins against...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by hunter
David, This is not really any different than the post WWI era in the US when eugenics indoctrination and popularity was quite high. The saving part of this AGW mania is that public education is...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by hunter
Michael, If you were actually informed on this you would be embarrassed.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Michael
though apparently it’s doing a sterling job churning out “child suicide bombers”….or so suggests hunter.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Michael
tell me more about “child suicide bombers”. I’m embarrassed that I seem to know far less about it than you.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by David Wojick
Just to elaborate, you are making this claim on a blog that has logged over 200k comments, mostly dedicated to presenting different sides of the science, much of it skeptical. Claiming the skeptical...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by David Wojick
There is plenty of research to support skepticism, some of which has been presented here. Your factual claims to the contrary are simply, and obviously, false.
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Jim Cripwell
Girma, you write “You know IPCC has got wrong its 0.2 deg C per decade warming prediction.” Absolutely correct. But please dont try and derail the point I am trying to make. Of course the IPCC got it...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Doug Allen
I said what I meant, caveman. Read it again!
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by willard
> Hunter AGW shouldn’t be an issue. 7 billion humans can change things. The issue is the CAGW part. CAGW is a big part of AGW. Just look at the acronym. Go team!
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Tom
Start here Michael, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zbigniew_Brzezinski better late than never?
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Tom
What is the current count on the Ummah, willard? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ummah They thought it a sin to count it, so how do we know?
View Article