Comment on The Bias of Science by Greybeard
How can we explain such pervasive bias? Obvious vested interest of the single funder – government – in the case of climate science.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Dan H.
Replies like Michael’s are common among the most fervent believers in CAGW. They claim their side is science, will the other is anti-science or propaganda. Name-calling appears to be a desperate...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by WebHubTelescope
100 PPM increase of atmospheric CO2 in 100 years is separate from the topic of AGW. Even if CO2 wasn’t a GHG the persistence argument is still solid. Salby and Bartemis claim that the rise is due to...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by geronimo
P.E. “They can’t teach the real science, because it’s all college material.” I don’t believe there’s any intention to teach the science, it’s a process of indoctrination, they’re being taught that...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Wagathon
Ooops, I have zinned. –>For the last 150y, the planet hasn’t accumulated enough extra heat, to boil one chicken egg. Is that Australian for ‘global warming alarmists have their heads up their up...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by darryl b
Just for the fun of it, here are two observations and a question that I gave to students in 9th grade (regarding density) and in chemistry (regarding the shape of water molecules). Very few arrived at...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Jim D
Edim, I was saying that CO2 can’t be a function of temperature only. You were fooled by Bartemis’s graph into not seeing the slow CO2 trend that he hides by looking only at high frequencies by focusing...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by mike
willard, This is getting to be perverse, willard. Bart’s “point” as you term it–that is, his preposterously mangled representation of Dr. McKitrick’s views–was not offered as a “point” in and of...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
Web, I think we are talking past each other. That annual breathing cycle of CO2 is fairly complex. The winter early spring is mainly southern ocean warming causing outgassing with the summer early fall...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Steven Mosher
David. Sorry about the quotes. Let me tell you how to parse them. It’s not that hard. When I write that people have “publications” I want you to understand that this term can mean many things and I...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Steven Mosher
I think we need a tree about trees or a tree about debates. or a debate about trees.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Bart R
darryl b | May 14, 2012 at 10:06 pm | Having lived in Minnesota (which I recommend for anyone who hasn’t), I’ll add a question the grandparents get the answer to right more often: why does the dog...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Tom
steven, Why not form a committee just to make sure. It’s for the kids.
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by jim2
The stench of decaying bodies in the Spring of colder climes has to contribute a bunch to CO2.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by hunter
Michael, Cowardly? Vilify? The article was written with their cooperation, certainly at the suggestion of their handlers. In what way have I vilified them? I vilify those who manipulated them into...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by jim2
Acidification except for that which is converted to CaCO2 and sinks. (A true sink )
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Bart R
Bad Andrew | May 14, 2012 at 1:14 pm | Oh. Did you mean you were hoping we’d go out and get the evidence for you and bring it to you? No, no. I was just observing that it went by at least a dozen times...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Stephen Rasey
@gbaikie <i>Humans evolved in the tropics- </i> Yes, but civilization evolved in the temperate zones. Look at the latitude ranges of the Nile and Tigris rivers.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Tom
From fires in South America, to truck loads of people freezing in the vast northern lakes, as they hang on to their pickup after fishing for a bit… You sure get around Bart.
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
http://i122.photobucket.com/albums/o252/captdallas2/whichisabettermatch.png The tropics really don’t have that much of a seasonal cycle. The northern latitudes have a pretty major seasonal cycle. Mauna...
View Article