Comment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Doug Allen
It didn’t return after the 1998 El Nino, did it?
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Willis Eschenbach
Thanks for the input, Mosh, but a more neutral way to bring that up would have been to say “Did you know that Anthony used reanalysis data in his paper”? Then I could have said, “No, Steven, I didn’t...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by mike
Thanks Beth, I got the hint. Henceforth, I’ll leave the poetry business to Chief, you, kim, and willard–this blog’s undisputable masters of the form. But I’m still putting “poet”–or maybe “poet...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Tom
How was the AGW lie missed by the smartest and most well paid people in the world over the last forty years? They lie to our faces and have the gall to call us ‘deniers. Even until today…...
View ArticleComment on The Bias of Science by Arno Arrak
Girma – you reproduced almost a third of Voosen’s article on provoked scientists trying to explain the lag in global warming and then trotted out the same HadCRUT3 graph I analyzed for you before. It...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Girma
It is at the neutral position (along the long-term trend of the secular GMT) as shown in the following graph => http://bit.ly/HRvReF GMT for 1998 => 0.53 GMT for 2011 => 0.34 A drop of about...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by GaryM
It’s not often I agree with anything coming out of NPR, but this is how they ought to teach science in grade/high school....
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Girma
Prediction: A further drop of 0.2 deg C below the current neutral position in the next two decades exactly like after 1955.
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by David Wojick
Peter, an issue tree is not a decision tree. The issue tree is about Understanding, neither more nor less. The decision tree people assume understanding, but 90% or more of decision making lies with...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by David Wojick
On the contrary Gary, if you look at most state standards, this is precisely what is being taught. This is why CAGW is so disruptive. It has no place in scied, but there it is. Politics overriding...
View ArticleComment on Climate sensitivity discussion thread by Jim D
ozzio, so your explanation of why the temperature is 288 K instead of 255 K is what? I saw no physics in your diatribe, or did you say it has been cooling since prehistoric times when actually it was...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by David Wojick
Just to clarify, we are teaching, as best we can, how the world works. Get off our backs.
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by DocMartyn
I combined the names of race horses and jockeys and then examined the letter combinations that produced profanities; the model was that the pair with the largest number of swear words would perform...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Herman Alexander Pope
Yes, Computer Model Output is not Data! That abuse does occur, time and time again. Thank you Willis for Pointing that out!
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Rob Starkey
I hope Judith will respond to Willis’s questions and points raised. I was writing a comment very similar but think he captured the concerns well.
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Paul S
RealClimate posted a nice concise description of <a href="http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2011/07/reanalyses-r-us/" rel="nofollow">reanalyses last year. The post was marking the...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by AJ
Here’s a test for the CMIP5 models, assuming that there are 1×1 monthly gridded datasets available for ocean temperature. 1. For each gridbox in the ocean between 0-2000M, detrend the temperature...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Oliver K. Manuel
whaaaaat? Science based on observations, like this: Nature <b.277, 615 – 620 (22 February 1979) http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v277/n5698/abs/277615a0.html Not puesdo-science propaganda, like...
View ArticleComment on Climate science in public schools by Edim
Paul S, the so-called airborn fraction is decreasing, while the consensus predicted increasing (another one bites the dust). I predict further decline if the cooling really kicks in. Human emissions...
View ArticleComment on CMIP5 decadal hindcasts by Curious George
Dear Brandon: First, please tell me kindly where to find reliable 100-hour weather predictions you have referred to. Second, I am ignorant enough to think that most climate models – at least those...
View Article