Comment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by NW
Agreed, and you demonstrate some bravery saying so, considering the litigious turn of Mann’s defenses.
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by M. carey
“Now consider Michael Mann, favorite whipping boy of the skeptics, as author of these papers. I suspect that the research would be characterized as fraudulent. Fraud seems to be a favorite word of...
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond by HAS
How do we judge the best model (given there is no future)?
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Disinformation and pseudo critical thinking by tempterrain
How come you aren’t asking me to leave too? You must reckon Robert is doing better than me! I’m offended
View ArticleComment on Letter to the dragon slayers by Andrew Skolnick
Kumquat, you’re starting to squeal like a stuck pig, now that the misdeeds of your fellow denier Mr. O’Sullivan are starting to catch up to him. Can’t wait to hear your squeals when the other shoes drop.
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by chriscolose
I haven’t really been following the philosophical back and forths between here, collid-o-scope, and other places about this. Of course it is natural to have expectations of a particular argument’s...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by M. carey
Accusations of fraud without evidence are no better than lies.
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by Don Aitkin
I can’t think how anyone could have an absolutely unbiassed, objective reaction to a criticism of something he or she wrote. When we write something that purports to improve humanity’s knowledge of...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by David Young
Sometimes, I wonder if a lot of this isn’t related to what I regard as a general decline in honesty as a fundamental value. This is not new, but does seem more pervasive to me. Science was at one time...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by pokerguy
“With Ludecke et al. as authors, the “convinced” made charges of purveying disinformation.” Yes, and I’m pretty sure a certain “expert on quality control” is regretting that charge more by the hour
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by M. carey
Brandon, I’m not sure you are the most accurate reporter when it comes to Michael Mann, so I am skeptical of your accusation that he knowingly made false claims. Will you provide verifiable evidence?
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond by WebHubTelescope
I see that too now that you mention it, but a large statistical analysis is what I did and I specifically avoided cherry-picking data. When I said there is 3% probability that you will find a...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by M. carey
I’m glad the more money you have, the more honest you are. My wealth has grown as I have aged, and now I am more honest than I have ever been in my life. I look forward to getting even more honest.
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by Wagathon
To be among the “convinced” you have to believe that a relatively small subset of Western academics have the courage to stand up to all of humanity and save it from itself and save the world from...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by Willis Eschenbach
Do I consider the author? Sure, but only for the smell test. The smell test proves nothing. It just points out where to search for something rotten. The part that is missing in your analysis, Judith,...
View ArticleComment on Tol’s critique of the Ludecke et al. papers by smithy
No, the proxies and Hockey Stick are just one of several streams of research. There are multiple, independent streams of research being done because redundancy is important for making the case. The...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by David Young
Well, yes and no. I seem to recall that the number of retracted papers has been growing. We have had credit bubbles before but this is the first one where mathematical models played a significant role....
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by Anteros
Bart R - Very interesting and thoughtful. Implicitly tolerant too in these particularly tribal waters Just one thing – I agree that Judith invites debate. And I too come here for that reason among...
View ArticleComment on Climate scientists are different(?) from the general public by led...
It’s the best time to make some plans for the future and it’s time to be happy. I have learn this put up and if I could I wish to suggest you few interesting things or advice. Perhaps you can write...
View Article