Comment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by blueice2hotsea
M. carey | <a href="http://judithcurry.com/2011/11/10/disinformation-vs-fraud-in-the-climate-debate/#comment-137036" rel="nofollow">November 11, 2011 at 5:29 pm</a> <i>"...it looks...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by Alex Heyworth
523 comments so far, (524 after this one) most of which have been the pots calling the kettles black and vice versa … thereby proving Dr Curry’s thesis.
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by oxonmoron
I appreciate this blog and its host Dr Curry and have learned a lot but regrettably have little to contribute of a scientific nature, indeed being long retired, I even find difficulty with my own...
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond by dallas
Web, “That amount of energy is only impressive if it happened over a short period of time, which is the current situation.” The change in surface temperature from the 1998 El nino to the 2000 recovery...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by Girma
At least we sceptics have the evidence of climategate for the unscientific methods of those that represent the scientific establishment, which demonstrates AGW is not a settled science: What we...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by dallas
Web, P.E. and Joe, I made this a blog post to keep track of it, http://redneckphysics.blogspot.com/2011/11/greenhouses-and-greenhouse-effect.html I brought up how conduction was not properly considered...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by Edim
Isn’t wind convection? Why conductive flux?
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by geronimo
Of course they do! In fact I almost there as a warmist/alarmist I just have niggling doubts about the models forecasting all the disasters, just little ones you understand as described by the...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by JCH
You don’t have a clue what he meant.
View ArticleComment on Week in review: 9/17/11 by купон безлимитные тарифы
Heya i am for the first time here. I found this board and I in finding It truly useful & it helped me out a lot. I am hoping to give something again and aid others like you helped me.
View ArticleComment on Peer review is f***ed up by Don Monfort
How do you determine the validity and quality of anonymous pal reviews, that you never have an opportunity to see? Extended peer review is open for all to see. Weigh the arguments against the...
View ArticleComment on Peer review is f***ed up by Ken Coffman
Here is some background on the “arsenic” paper. http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2011/05/the_discovery_of_arsenicbased_twitter.html
View ArticleComment on Peer review is f***ed up by P.E.
Or to put it another way, the system needs to be better than Amazon.com, where there have been documented cases of people writing reviews of books that hadn’t been published yet. Having things “open”...
View ArticleComment on Peer review is f***ed up by tempterrain
Judith, I suspect that this post as at least partly influenced by a recent failure, by you and your husband, to get a paper past the peer review process. Furthermore, whatever its deficiencies might...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Peer review is f***ed up by Libreman
A crowd-sourced long-term reputation system? Check out http://hypothes.is for possible solution to the problem you highlighted. It IS being worked on and it’d work for all content, not only scientific...
View ArticleComment on Peer review is f***ed up by sharper00
“How do you determine the validity and quality of anonymous pal reviews, that you never have an opportunity to see?” I don’t, the editor does. “Extended peer review is open for all to see.” Open for...
View ArticleComment on Two new papers vs. BEST by Berényi Péter
<i><b>The mean reduces to 0.52 °C if stations with less than 1000 population only are included, which documents the UHI. Further evidence of the UHI is given in Figure...
View ArticleComment on Peer review is f***ed up by sharper00
“A crowd-sourced long-term reputation system? “ Once you construct a system of rules the system will be subverted and gamed. See any internet ranking system ever devised for examples. “Check out...
View ArticleComment on Ludecke et al. respond by HAS
Fred Moolten November 12, 2011 at 10:51 am That was rather a throwaway comment to make the point that over time the heat content of the ocean and SST are likely to move together. One of course do need...
View ArticleComment on Disinformation vs fraud in the climate debate by GaryM
Oil companies raise their prices all the time. If enough companies do so, the price stays up. If enough don’t, either the price falls or the company that raised its prices loses market share and...
View Article