Comment on Letter to the dragon slayers by manacker
steven mosher the mails merely provided the proof [of skulduggery] and some interesting personal color As your book points out quite clearly… Max
View ArticleComment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by Bryan
Continuation of previous post. ……pyrgeometer. Very important and often overlooked the net flux or heat is going up from the instrument to the colder atmosphere. Many assume (wrongly) that the 66W/m2 is...
View ArticleComment on Research ethics training by Latimer Alder
@andrew adams ‘it’s likely that if the data had been relating to a less controversial area of science then the existence of non-disclosure agreements would have been accepted as sufficient grounds for...
View ArticleComment on Letter to the dragon slayers by manacker
lolwot As an outsider in this conversation, it seems to me that Jim Cripwell has made a very sensible statement of his views, as a scientist who is rationally skeptical of the premise that added...
View ArticleComment on Letter to the dragon slayers by Ken Coffman
Climate science is a “fuzzy” science with lots of chaotic data. It relies on things that are tough to conceive, measure and quantify like TOA Radiation Balance and positive feedback mechanisms. Many of...
View ArticleComment on Emails by Labmunkey
Actually there is. The UK courts for one ruled there was evidence of FOI avoidance, which is illegal. They only escaped prosecution due to a ‘timing’ legal loop hole that was improperly applied....
View ArticleComment on Emails by Labmunkey
probably that the person using the term ‘denier’ is attempting to malign via association. or something like that….
View ArticleComment on Emails by Latimer Alder
Billions. About $2.5 billion per annum just from the US Government
View ArticleComment on Research ethics training by kuhnkat
Well M. Carey, You appear to NOT have responded to me on giving us the context of your assertion. I will have to ASSume that you are talking about the following: Exo 21:7 And if a man sell his daughter...
View ArticleComment on Emails by Latimer Alder
As a founder of and contributor to a little-known or viewed website called ‘real climate’, Mann has appointed himself as a spokesman for the whole of climatology. Reading between the lines of the CG2...
View ArticleComment on Emails by andrew adams
If that ever actually happens in the real world instead of in the fevered imaginations of conspiracy loons then maybe we will find out.
View ArticleComment on Emails by Andrew Dodds
What jumps in reasoning? Theft is theft. Most people consider theft unethical. Furthermore, if there was a noble aim behind this theft, there is no way whatsoever it could be served by sitting on the...
View ArticleComment on Emails by andrew adams
So Mann is a part of a group of scientists trying to educate and inform the public about climate science, good for him. That doesn’t make it true that billions of dollars have been spent on...
View ArticleComment on Research ethics training by kuhnkat
gbalkie, while it does not disprove your example for oil, the gubmint is who sets the official reserve amounts in the US and most other countries. We could speculate that the gubmint would overstate...
View ArticleComment on Emails by tallbloke
Bart: The problem is that the period of tenure as head of *insert name of August Institution here* is such that ambitious characters like Michael Mann with a strong self belief think short cuts to...
View ArticleComment on Emails by Andrew Dodds
There is excellent agreement between the tree ring proxies and direct temperature measurements up to the 1960s, and a divergence thereafter. Now, we are pretty sure that the thermometers are not wrong;...
View ArticleComment on Research ethics training by kuhnkat
No Bart R, You try and start your own Monty Python skit yet again. As usual you make up your own interpretation with little reference to facts. A sceptic attempts to arrive at an honest evaluation...
View ArticleComment on Emails by andrew adams
The problem with that email is there is not a shred of evidence it ever existed
View ArticleComment on Emails by Andrew Dodds
The chance of a major earthquake in San Francisco is near 100% given sufficient time. It’s an interesting illustration of how bad people are at judging how to react to this kind of threat; high impact...
View ArticleComment on Emails by Latimer Alder
Sorry Andrew, Mann doesn’t so easily get the pass that you are trying to give him. One of the main reasons that climatology has had such a firehose of money thrown at it is because of his...
View Article