Comment on McKitrick on the IPCC by kim
v. 2 Warm is good. Cold is bad. CO2 is good. Too bad you’ve been had. =============
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Anteros
Rob Starkey - I’m not sure the population growth idea is a serious problem. Surely an agreement would just pick an appropriate population level and fix per capita emissions at that number. You may see...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Paul S
I have more interesting things on my reading list at the moment so I probably won't get around to it to be honest. However, McKitrick's argument is based on Laframboise's work in this area and I've...
View ArticleComment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by Peter317
Joel, I don’t think people are confused by the concept that, given the same amount of heating, things which are already warm get hotter than things which were colder.
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by kim
v. 3 Warm is good. Cold is bad. CO2 is food. Too bad you’ve been had. ===========
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by M. carey
manaker, I believe the hacker is likely a thief with an agenda rather than, as you prefer to believe, likely a whistleblower motivated by moral duty. Perhaps you can address the following questions: If...
View ArticleComment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by gbaikie
“The accounting is pretty straightforward: Of the ~341 W/m^2 of incoming radiation, about 79 W/m^2 is reflected by clouds or other elements of the atmosphere, 23 W/m^2 is reflected by the earth’s...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Anteros
Kim – Don’t worry! I’m doing an ‘OK, lets make the assumption that Co2 does naughty things and see how the world looks. I believe the assumption is reversible – otherwise I’m f*cked
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by kim
OK, Anteros, it’s ok to think that way, just so long as we don’t act that way until we are a little less ignorant. ============
View ArticleComment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by Peter317
Ken Coffman: The so-called GHGs can delay energy’s escape to space by a few milliseconds You keep saying that, yet you offer little by way of an explanation of the mechanics thereof. Why not give a...
View ArticleComment on Emails by Jacob
“In terms of the science nothing much will actually change just its perception. ” We learned from the mails that many of the authors hockey stick papers believe it to be “crap”. So, indeed, nothing...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by rustneversleeps
yes, and further to m.carey’s points, why did the perpetrator hack into RealClimate’s website? Doesn’t sound very whistleblower-like. By the way, what was the topic of this thread again?
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by vukcevic
Equally I would not consider this as a prediction, it is again extrapolation of an equation which may (or may not) be a reasonable representation of the natural variability....
View ArticleComment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by gbaikie
“Joel, I don’t think people are confused by the concept that, given the same amount of heating, things which are already warm get hotter than things which were colder.” I am. If one had no or 1/2...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by manacker
Anteros You write: Surely there is a per capita emissions level that everybody should be heading towards – with some adjustments for the ‘sins’ of history I would agree with the direction, but would...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by VeryTallGuy
“The scientists that prepared this report for the UN are liars,and I don’t need a degree in science to know that.” As ClimateEtc has been “pondering how to best teach research ethics”, anyone like to...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by P.E.
Here’s the problem. You can’t rule out significant issues completely. It’s entirely reasonable, in and if itself, for an international agency to monitor the science, and based on an honest assessment...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by GaryM
Hey, telling Dr. Curry how to run her blog is Joshua’s job!
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by tonyb
Max In reply to M Carey, the reason why the ‘whistleblower’ is keeping a low profile is that they know they will be persecuted, as blaming the whilstleblowers rather than the wrong doer is firmly...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Martha
I can help you. kim is male. That is easy to see from his behaviour on this and any other thread. But here is a clear example to illustrate: “Heh, Joshua stamps his pretty little foot, andrew adams...
View Article