Comment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by curryja
oh no, definitely missing a lot of text at the end, i will try to recover it before i have to catch my plane
View ArticleComment on How not to save the planet by hro001
<blockquote>An obsession with ‘sustainability’ is similar. Everything glorious about the history of the human enterprise has been based on precisiely the opposite of sustainability. [...] Without...
View ArticleComment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by Joshua
No hurries – It was just odd that there was an entire discussion of text that seemed like it was from the post, and then billc later noted that the text in question was not part of the post??!!?? I’m...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by capt. dallas
Joshua, MattStat is right. Tamino did an estimate of the minimum range to determine statistical significant trends a while back and came up with 14.7 years. If I remember correctly, 14.7 years wasn’t...
View ArticleComment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by curryja
apparently what go restored was a previous draft, seems the final version is lost in the ether. I fixed a few things in the text and added some stuff, too bad since i think the original was better but...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on How not to save the planet by Anteros
hro001 - I came to a realisation this afternoon. Looking through historical examples, of course many thousands of glorious things occurred, were possible, and wouldn’t have existed had there been an...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by capt. dallas
That was actually a pretty good one Joshua, if you are into instrumentation error and limitations
View ArticleComment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by Stephen Pruett
Falsifying AGW wouldn’t require breaking the laws of physics if there were negative feedbacks. Have negative feedbacks been decisively ruled out? If so, what is the evidence?
View ArticleComment on Assessing climate data record transparency and maturity by John...
Curious, I feel your pain. However I am not a bit surprised after all this time there is no system for proper data documentation and full disclosure of collection, analysis and ‘adjustments’ methods as...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by capt. dallas
No they are not ruled out and they are every where. Falsification is a problem because it is not one theory, but a blend of two with error ranges covering both. Powder puff science, ya don’t want to...
View ArticleComment on Tracking the line between treatment and diagnosis by Brian H
Even there, there are issues. Iatrogenic damage is far more serious and widespread than publicly acknowledged, and a premier source of death and damage is misdiagnosis. Hammer-wielders seeing nails...
View ArticleComment on How not to save the planet by stefanthedenier
Sam NC | January 31, 2012 at 4:20 am | Reply The Earth continues changing climate cold periods and warm periods. Only idiots think they can do something to change these periods. Sam NC, you should not...
View ArticleComment on Tracking the line between treatment and diagnosis by Brian H
As the world has grown more “crowded” and developed, climate change has proved to be (relatively) less and less of a problem (per capita). That boogy-man doesn’t roar. Furthermore, as I have pointed...
View ArticleComment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by Bob Fernley-Jones
I see that according to the “Recent Comments” list that Mosh’ and Max have contributed <b>somewhere</b> in the 443 comments above at this moment. I deeply respect both these guys, but why...
View ArticleComment on Tracking the line between treatment and diagnosis by Edim
Jim D, you think that no focings are responsible for the positive multidecadal ENSO trend? http://climexp.knmi.nl/data/imei.png
View ArticleComment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by manacker
MattStat As the Chief wisely suggests, the end of WWII is a good starting point as far as human CO2 emissions are concerned. That is when human CO2 emissions really began to rise. [According to CDIAC...
View ArticleComment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by manacker
bill c and Anteros The first decade of the 21st century was supposed to warm by 0.2 degC according to IPCC. It didn’t warm at all (maybe even cooled slightly). By the same IPCC model forecasts that...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Climate scenarios: 2015-2050 by climatereason
Bob For heavens sake, where’s your spirit of adventure Seriously, that sounds a doddle compared to ploughing through the 500 articles I have aquired for my next piece on the Arctic, some 350 of them...
View ArticleComment on Tracking the line between treatment and diagnosis by manacker
Girma You can’t argue with Trenberth – he’s convinced that “the science is settled”. Don’t confuse him with facts. Max
View ArticleComment on Tracking the line between treatment and diagnosis by Coldish
Thanks, Cui Bono. I haven’t been able to locate Trenberth’s article, but I find it hard to believe that he wrote some of the phrases you have quoted. He sounds desperate.
View Article