Comment on Solar discussion thread II by Chief Hydrologist
Oh – while Sol may be interesting enough the data limitations don’t allow much of any significance to be deduced. In may be more useful to consider trends in anomalies and bring in ocean and atmosphere...
View ArticleComment on Solar discussion thread II by Chief Hydrologist
sunspots have been counted since the invention of the telescope
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by Vaughan Pratt
Very compelling visuals in the Lindzen video, Anteros, thank you for posting that. However one has to wonder whether there was anyone in that audience both competent in statistics and willing to...
View ArticleComment on Solar discussion thread II by Oliver K. Manuel
Reality (as revealed by experimental measurements): 1. Earth’s heat source is a pulsar, the same nuclear furnace that made our elements. That conclusion is based on data from hundreds of analyses of...
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by cwon14
It’s good to be optimistic Jim, some of the time. The toady green infiltration into physical science, its dependency on debt finance and the usual trappings of government excess are becoming far more...
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by Jim Cripwell
Girma, you write “Why does Realclimate insist the business as usual case in Hansen et al model is scenario B instead of A?” Simple. If they agree you are right, then the IPCC predictions are clearly...
View ArticleComment on Solar discussion thread II by David L. Hagen
I was surprised at how much higher the uncertainty was than the claimed imbalance on which IPCC claims 90% confidence. <blockquote>There is a <b>6 W m-2 discrepancy </b>in the...
View ArticleComment on Solar discussion thread II by DocMartyn
I must admit that I find the correlation between lake levels and the solar cycle baffling. I have no idea what process can be the link, but I suspect that the levels of various bodies of water have...
View ArticleComment on Solar discussion thread II by J. Seifert
The Sun’s output is heat source for the Earth…..but how much of it reaches the Earth depend on the Earth’s orbit….. The IPCC+ AGW keep the orbit CONSTANT or “INVARIANT”….on a millenium scale…..this is...
View ArticleComment on Solar discussion thread II by blouis79
Have you seen Shaviv’s paper. Link in the bibliography. http://www.sciencebits.com/OnClimateSensitivity Does CERNs cloud experiment count, even though not published yet that I have seen.
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by capt. dallas
Chris Ho, I thought the discussion was on whether H I will be falsified and if H II and H III might be worth consideration. Since the projections are based on the models simulations that indicate...
View ArticleComment on Solar discussion thread II by Oliver K. Manuel
Richard, I strongly suspect that most “galactic cosmic rays” and all of our elements actually came from the Sun’s pulsar core, not from remote regions of the galaxy. That would explain experimental...
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by Joshua
Matt - I didn’t see a question.You seem to want skeptics to prove that something is correct, … Good point. The question was whether or not my construction (to the extent that it was even...
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by Chief Hydrologist
Absolutely – the models are right because they are wrong and need to be rethunk. Ummm. The models are right because they are uncertain. Ummm. The models are right…
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by Dikran marsupial
The observations being consistent with the models does not mean the models are right, it just means that they haven’t been demonstrated to be fundamentally wrong.
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by timg56
Chief, That’s what the gun is for. The cougars that is.
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by Sol
Chris Ho-Stuart - I agree with your point about length of trends, and generally would go even further.. You mention that - From 1979-1999 onwards, the HadCRUT 20 year window has never gone below 0.15....
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by David Wojick
Gee, I posted three comments to Chris and he responded to none. I give up. Let his silly argument stand.
View ArticleComment on Trends, change points & hypotheses by David Wojick
Web, we view your view as a lack of understanding. Evidence based.
View Article