Comment on God and the arrogant species by Wagathon
My stochastic projection is that rationalists see AGW climate models for what they are: dead animals — climate models have zero predictive value: (Demetris Koutsoyiannis et al., On the credibility of...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on God and the arrogant species by ThePowerofXThePowerofX
Personally, I understand that people who don’t summarise the evidence correctly, (ab)use the ‘arrogant species’ and ‘Tower of Babel’ thing to support all kinds of rubbish. Oliver will like like this one.
View ArticleComment on Letter to the dragon slayers by Doug Cotton
I did attend the University of Sydney where I studied physics under Profs Harry Messel, Julius Sumner-Miller and Verner Von Braun from 1963 to 1966 inclusive before doing Economics and Business...
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by Willis Eschenbach
Koutsoyiannis, in my experience, is always worth listening to. Thanks for this, Judith, good find. w.
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by Wagathon
“… at the 30-year climatic time scale, the average correlation coefficient rises slightly to 0.237 for temperature and remains slightly negative (–0.046) for precipitation; however, the average...
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by Wagathon
“… given that virtually no research into possible natural explanations for global warming has been performed, it is time for scientific objectivity and integrity to be restored to the field of global...
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by David Wojick
They are not presenting a summary of evidence; they are presenting a theory, and a credible one at that. Your arrogance is helpful in this context.
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by Beth Cooper
‘Put the blame on Meme, boys, put the blame on Meme.’ (and on models that reproduce the hypotheses of their programmers) (and on indulgences.) H/T Rita Hayworth
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by Wagathon
“There is no scientific justification for some of the extremist economic and social penalties that a minority of zealots are trying to impose on the people of the world.” ~Koutsoyiannis
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by Wagathon
Does everyone know who ‘they’ are? They are the same people who made Al Gore rich and hated G. Bush for standing in the way of Kyoto. “… they are unable to predict weather beyond a week or two, yet in...
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by Anteros
Yes – great post. This seems to me to just about fall within the realms of ‘science’ but at the same time makes the point that it is less about ‘the science’ than many climate scientists would like to...
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by Wagathon
IPCC scientists have already admitted the simple truth about computer climate modeling: “In fact there are no predictions by IPCC at all. And there never have been. The IPCC instead proffers ‘what if’...
View ArticleComment on New version of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature data set by...
Malahat BC 2002 Dec Only a 17.89 difference. EC 2002-12: MALAHAT |48.575 |-123.530 |BC | 4.1| 1| | 10.6| 0| -2.7| 1| | | | 3.0| 23| | | 1| | | | 416.5| 0.0|1014820...
View ArticleComment on God and the arrogant species by Rob Starkey
If a system is too complex at a particular point in history to be fully understood and correctly modeled, that is NOT evidence of the existence or involvement of a supernatural being in the process. It...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by Mark F
Uh, yeah, but why should a professor be immune to ridicule or criticism in response to their (IMO) arrogant display of hubris and intolerance?
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by Pat Cassen
Wojick is not Heartland's first venture into K-12 'education'. Fred, <a href="http://joannenova.com.au/2009/03/skeptics-handbook-spreads-en-masse-150000-copies/" rel="nofollow">here's</a>...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by alfanerd
and pretending the “science is settled” is insulting. and wanting to regulate the lives of everybody on the planet based on faulty science is criminal and authoritarian. refusing to debate the faulty...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by MattStat
Kim Cobb: <i> Ironically, we cannot begin to have the kind of debates that you call for (is it “dangerous”? how much can we really say about regional impacts? how much should we invest in...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Teaching (?) the controversy by Anteros
OK – I confess. Gleick’s stuff was faked
View Article