Comment on Teaching (?) the controversy by patrioticduo
Clearly, you have not examined the uncertainty of the claim that human CO2 emission is the primary forcing that has caused the warming that has been going on since the end of the little ice age. Yet,...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by alfanerd
The ERBE satellite readings (Lindzen and Choi), the very strong correlation between GCR and climate on pretty much all time scales, the 800 year lag between temp and CO2 in ice core data, the absence...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by curryja
Kim, I have NEVER called into question the existence of anthropogenic climate change. Cite one statement that I have made in a paper or on this blog that says that. Disagreeing with the IPCC, or saying...
View ArticleComment on Gleick’s ‘integrity’ by timg56
People who come up with crap like the PI’s mission statement, or believe in it are what scare me. Their end goal is to eliminate half to two-thirds of the worlds population. Personally I think it is...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by andrew adams
Rob, I think you have to distinguish between “controversies” and “uncertainties”. All of the things you mention are uncertain (in both directions) and this uncertainty should be made clear in the...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by patrioticduo
Take a look at the “science” curriculum across America today and the sections on pollution, urban development, endangered species and global warming are all right in there already. Teachers guides...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by GaryM
Good thing green advocacy groups are staying out of primary and secondary education unlike that evil Heartland. “Oxfam and Think Global* submitted our views to this process. We see it as a great...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Teaching (?) the controversy by Don B
Anteros, your fake fooled me – I thought it was completely credible.
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Gleick’s ‘integrity’ by ivp0
Sorry, my bad. The prior mission statement was just a Glieckover of the original which appears below. It is obviously fake but accurate My apologies to anyone who might have been misled. The genuine...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by David Springer
DocMartyn | February 22, 2012 at 8:00 pm | “Specifically on the implication of nuclear winter Judy. Don’t you think it odd that while the RAF/USAAF were burning German and Japanese cities (and their...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by manacker
The analogy of the “chain” of evidence is not a bad one. We all know that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. The “weak link” of the IPCC’s CAGW hypothesis today is that it is not supported...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by pokerguy
I’m delighted they’d go so far as to invite you Judith. I doubt they’d have done this a year ago. I see this as a positive development. Heretofore, it’s been wall to wall hockey team members on NPR....
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by manacker
OK. Let’s look at this 1960s video clip more closely. Is the serious-looking long-haired little girl on the left Martha? And the cute little girl with the pig-tails on the far right, could it be…? The...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by Michael Larkin
Will a recording be available? If so, might I ask where? TIA
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by manacker
Moderator is “Larry”? Will “Moe” and “Curly” also be there?
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by pokerguy
Not finding it. Boston area…WBUR and WGBH…Assumed it would be on Talk of the Nation on WBUR
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by Bob K.
We’d be doing well by teaching K-12 students basic reasoning skills instead of scientific controversies for which they don’t have the tools to make reasoned decisions. Perhaps non-U.S. posters here are...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by Willis Eschenbach
No joy on the left coast either, San Francisco KQED has Talk of the Nation but no Judith … dang.
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by manacker
CNP You start off with a good observation on the use of question marks in headlines, but then blow it all with a silly conclusion of why our host here frequently does this.. A question mark denotes...
View Article