Comment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Barry Woods
Hi Judy Were you just looking at the slides? Ie you don’t quite get all of what he said.. Ie the co2 equivalence DID include methane, etc. Why not watch the video of it and perhaps reconsider some of...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by J. Seifert
The House of Commons is an important place, where policy is being made….they need understandable arguments…. Let’s throw the “Likes of the Gleicks” out and get all the Lindzens in…. rejoyce...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by Edim
Doug, there’s a simpler explanatation, which is accepted by everyone (skeptics and warmists) – only net radiation is heat (or energy) and this Qnet is the sum of all “individual” fluxes (between bodies...
View ArticleComment on Gleick’s Testimony on Threats to the Integrity of Science by timg56
I believe that the Red side is at least smart enough to understand that the Blue’s, as a percentage, are much more likely to possess firearms and therefore fully understand that it is only by utilizing...
View ArticleComment on Teaching (?) the controversy by Edim
http://thermophysics.ru/pdf_doc/ahttv122.pdf
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Anteros
Dr Curry - Is there much in the whole climate debate that isn’t relevant to this talk, and therefore this thread? In slide 19 Lindzen talks about the two necessary ingredients for climate panic – 1)...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Robinson
You say that, but according to Dellingpole there were only 2 MPs present at Lindzen’s talk. I was disgusted to hear this, but I suppose not really all that surprised.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Pooh, Dixie
Any chance to talk with Dr. Lindzen?????
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by vukcevic
J.C: <i>The second half of the talk is Lindzen’s perspective on the science, which IMO has some good points but is overly simplistic.</i> but Lindzen’s Seminar was at the House of Commons
View ArticleComment on Gleick’s Testimony on Threats to the Integrity of Science by cui bono
A. Lacis – It’s bad enough having all your excuses as to why the stupid toy models are diverging from the real world of facts, but spare usl your excuses as to why Gleick diverged from the real world...
View ArticleComment on Gleick’s Testimony on Threats to the Integrity of Science by timg56
I go with open another can – except I prefer bottles. And as I get older, it becomes more likely to be uncork another bottle or pour me another double. I find it very entertaining to watch news...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Anteros
Barry – I couldn’t find the video. Do you have a link?
View ArticleComment on Gleick’s Testimony on Threats to the Integrity of Science by timg56
David, Starship Troopers was much better in my opinion. The movie didn’t do it justice.
View ArticleComment on Energy policy discussion thread by tonyb
Vaughan Of course trains didn’t fit inside the 15 inch pipes. It was more the general principle of evacuation that I thought you would be interested in. The larger the tube the greater the expense and...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Chris G
Well, because it is the BEST data that is readily available. Do you think BEST land-ocean will be of a different shape, other than the hockey stick I just showed you? A hockey stick just refers to a...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by feet2thefire
Brandon and Chris G - Brandon, I'd also mention to Chris G the <i>amount</i> and slope of the cut-off tree-ring curve. I mean, it wasn't just a <i>little</i> bit of divergence...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Edim
“…what do you think is driving the increasing energy in the system as shown in your graph?” My take is: the most of the increase is driven by the increase in solar cycle frequency (decrease in solar...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Girma
Vaughan Pratt The warming trend is in fact far from linear. It is linear => http://bit.ly/wzkYvi (a LINEAR warming trend of 0.06 deg C per decade with an oscillation of 0.5 deg C every 30 years) To...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by feet2thefire
juakola and Chris G - juakola, you don’t see a hockey stick there? It is every bit as much of one as GisTemp or HadCrut3. Do you need tape on the blade and Wayne Gretsky’s autograph on it? BEST’s blade...
View Article