Comment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Latimer Alder
@andrew I’m not interested in their opinion of what is wrong with Lindzen’s slides. *You* raised the point, so I’m interested in *your* opinion. And to be perfectly honest, if Colose told me the time,...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by feet2thefire
Brandon: “I have no idea what you mean here. BEST doesn’t use any tree ring records. All it uses is actual, measured temperatures.” About the tree-ring density vs width data sets, someone had a link to...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Brandon Shollenberger
Chris G, if you’re going to respond to me, I ask you read what I post. You say: Nope, I’m still looking at two distinct lines, clearly labeled. Actual runs from 1905 to 1995, and reconstructed runs...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Brandon Shollenberger
Chris G, your claim is here false, and you haven’t offered the slightest shred of evidence to support it.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Edim
Cut the Orwellian speak. Do you doubt that Earth is cooling on multi-millennial time scale (~10 ka)?
View ArticleComment on Energy policy discussion thread by Vaughan Pratt
Thanks for spotting that the article I linked to was 7 years out of date, Bruce. I gather the bottom line is that diesel for passenger vehicles is not economically viable. Since truck operators seem to...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by feet2thefire
Brandon - I should have included this in the last comment… [Steve Garcia] If the DP only affects some measurements, why does Briffa – and Schweingruber and others – still have a problem with it? Last I...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Brandon Shollenberger
feet2thefire, I don’t know where you got that link from, but it’s not a link to the “BEST’s data set listing.” It’s not even on BEST’s website. It’s on Nature’s. Wait a second… I recognize that list....
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Jen
Chris I agree completely with your comments here – both on the scientific flaws in Lindzen’s talk (which I have yet to see much discussion on here – not a surprise), and on your disappointment in the...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Brandon Shollenberger
Martin Lack, when you stop making things up about me, we can maybe have a discussion. Until then, this is my last response to you: <blockquote>Brandon, I’m sorry but, I can’t see where you...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Vaughan Pratt
<i>Past increase of atmospheric CO2 level has been exponential, at a constant CAGR of between 0.4% and 0.5% per year.</i> If that were true, Max, it would have been 145 ppmv 200 years ago....
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Brandon Shollenberger
There is nothing too ridiculous for people to state in complete seriousness. WebHubTelescope provides an example: Increase of greenhouse gases by 87%? Co2 only has increased by 40%. Notice how Manacker...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Michael
vaughan, You’ve misunderstood an important point. Max, quite rightly, says, it’s “simple math”. The rest of us might prefer simply math.
View ArticleComment on JC interview by Markus Ftzhenry.
For all you kinds out there, here’s a summary of the carbon cycle. http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/02/29/3442312.htm What’s missing? Maybe a few inconvenient measurements.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Latimer Alder
@martin lack Hold down the CTRL key. and simultaneously hit the ‘f’ key. This will summon up a ‘find’ box, in which you can type whatever characters you wish to find (eg ‘timg56′). This is a standard...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Brian H
Mark; In my experience, those who pose questions in that maundering manner are trying to set up an inescapable “Gotcha!” and in effect are speechifying, not asking at all. The listeners they imagine...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Brandon Shollenberger
Vaughan Pratt, did you just tell manacker he was wrong about the rate of increased in CO2 levels because if you take his rate back in time far enough, it gives too low a value? That’s how I’m reading...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Barry Woods
On his blog, Martin states he was NOT allowed to ask questions……
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Latimer Alder
Judging on Lack’s Open Letter to Lindzen which just rambles on and on about a lot of stuff about how clever he (Lack) is and never gets to the point (if there is one), I’m not surprised he got closed...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by John Kosowski
Martin, If you are wrong about the coming “mass extinction event” and are successful in banning the use of fossil fuels, you will be the enemy of humanity just like Rachel Carson was an enemy of...
View Article