Comment on Week in review 3/2/12 by Beth Cooper
Government looked on as a vast public utility, and its ever encroaching.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by john
Florrie and Scott, Ray answered at RC only a few comments below you, Hank Roberts says: 3 Mar 2012 at 11:45 AM > Florrie says: 3 Mar 2012 at 1:09 AM > Current theory says there will steady...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by Captain Kangaroo
Dear Beth I have put aside my peaceful pursuits of arts, letters and natural philosophy and taken up a martial calling. It is a necessity – the times and the climate wars demand it. In another time and...
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by Edim
That evidence is very weak. Such accuracy is physically implausible. On the other hand, we have thousands of direct measurements, which are discarded by the consensus. Not very scientific.
View ArticleComment on Climate policy discussion thread by GaryM
“For instance, given Mass v. EPA it is difficult to argue that the EPA Administrator was wrong to conclude that the emission of greenhouse gases cause or contribute to air pollution that could be...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
A physicist, the demagoguery thing is getting a bit played. You specifically brought up vague references to statistical studies that you imply have some significance. In one, you listed a hazard ratio...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by A physicist
Readers of Trish Roberts-Miller’s essay <a href="http://www.drw.utexas.edu/roberts-miller/handouts/demagoguery" rel="nofollow"><i>Characteristics of Demagoguery</i></a> will...
View ArticleComment on Climate policy discussion thread by David in Cal
I wish there were some way for the courts to take magnitude into effect. Even if one believes the warmists’ doomsday models, the actions contemplated by the EPA will have too small an impact to make an...
View ArticleComment on Carbon cycle questions by Brian H
Couldn’t remember which thread this discussion was on, so I’d posted this elsewhere on Feb 6: Last August there was considerable discussion about Salby’s upcoming paper, on posts such as...
View ArticleComment on Climate policy discussion thread by GaryM
“Contraception,” “women’s reproductive health,” and “family planning” Such wonderful euphemisms for abortion. We have to kill more third world babies in the womb so they won’t use fossil fuels and mess...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Week in review 3/2/12 by A physicist
Peter317 says: I’m sorry about what I said earlier on. Peter317, your regrets are sincerely appreciated. If only all skeptical forums would refrain from: • ingroup/outgroup thinking, • a rhetoric of...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by Beth Cooper
Judith Curry @ 4/12 919am. ‘Historically demagoguery is a precursor to the ending of democracy.’ Thank you for your wise observation and for the open forum you offer for the many diverse views,...
View ArticleComment on Climate policy discussion thread by cwon14
What about “as it exists” don’t you understand David?
View ArticleComment on Climate policy discussion thread by Bad Andrew
“Suggesting a strong connection between family planning and the environment often risks an explosion in the highly charged political landscape of climate talks” Exactly GaryM. It’s just more of “which...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
Bob, have you noticed how the CAGW crowd have starting complaining that the satellite data must be wrong?
View ArticleComment on Climate policy discussion thread by Jeff
The idea of population engineering is anathema. The result of the one baby policy in China has resulted everything from dramatic abortion rates, to episodes of infanticide (due in part to a cultural...
View ArticleComment on Climate policy discussion thread by Jim S
I’ve noticed more and more “enviro/population” stories in the MSM lately. These seem a bit premature. One would think that the population control push would come AFTER cap and trade is set in place....
View ArticleComment on Carbon cycle questions by Edim
The natural environment being a net carbon sink doesn’t mean that the atmospheric CO2 growth isn’t caused by warming climatic factors. Au contraire!
View ArticleComment on Climate policy discussion thread by Robert
For the unique blend of climate denial, ignorance about women’s health, confusing contraception with abortion, and paranoid ravings about “power over the economy” I dub this the comment of the day:...
View Article