Comment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by Sean2
Be careful. The past can be interpolated. The future is always an extrapolation.
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by Sean2
But……but……but……. If the displays are beautiful with nice crisp colors, then the models must be right.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Alex Harvey
Fred, People from the consensus side of the argument interpret Lindzen’s statement as an accusation of fraud, or something close to it. I do not read it that way. Lindzen is actually quoted as saying,...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by Girma
UK’s Hadley Centre for Climate Research recently noted that their model did not appropriately deal with natural internal variability thus demolishing the basis for the IPCC’s iconic attribution (Smith...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Vaughan Pratt
The problem with your graph (http://bit.ly/zQMoq7) is that your smoothed curve is off from the 1940s peak by more than half of the 1970-2000 warming, You raise an excellent point there, Girma. The...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by GaryM
There is some truth to that. If you accept all of the worst case scenarios of CAGW, and all of the assumptions about tipping points and catastrophes, and all of the assumptions that the Earth’s climate...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Bruce Friesen
Just for fun, I looked again at Slide 4, and I do not see the term “IPCC” on that slide.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Vaughan Pratt
It is sort of creepy how implying Earth could be like Venus sticks around, no matter the differences that make it impossible. Hunter, if there’s any difference that makes it impossible, I’m all ears....
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by robin
what an excellent comment. +1
View ArticleComment on Lindzen’s Seminar at the House of Commons by Girma
Pete Ridley Thanks for this post.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by Faustino
The last time I passed Brown’s office, on the Hobart waterfront, I took the opportunity to boo loudly. Didn’t change the world, but I enjoyed it.
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by Faustino
On the questions of government action and responsibility which often arise, herewith Judith Sloan (a good economist) in the Weekend Australian: “In what was an important speech delivered at the Press...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
Patchy, Patchy watch the glaciers grow. There was one quote missing that I always found interesting,...
View ArticleComment on Week in review 3/2/12 by Venter
Andrew Adams, Better understand what you talk about before posting If it was released by an insider it is a whisteblowing leak as it exposes fraudulent behaviour by people on Government funded...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on Week in review 3/2/12 by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
It must be pretty frustrating for people wanting to do real science to be mixed up in this mess. Since the Stieg et. al 2009 still gets a prominent consideration in the zero draft at least, that tends...
View ArticleComment on What can we learn from climate models? Part II by Jim D
Yes, skeptics, please look at Paleoclimate for a clue. The last time CO2 was over 500 ppm was the Cretaceous, and it was over 1000 ppm in the Jurassic. Was it warmer then? Were sea levels higher? This...
View Article