Comment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Edim
“No, I don’t: the whole point of the greenhouse effect is that the CO2 reduces emissions from the earth in the IR, so that, in order to balance the radiation input, the earth must heat up so as to...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
When I hear the words quantitative easing I reach for my gun – damned I left it in my other pants.
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Bart R
maksimovich | April 8, 2012 at 4:10 am | Whatever happened to the good old days before the whole world depended on America for everything? Oh. Yeah. That would’ve been two centuries ago. The USA is in...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by maksimovich
The problem is the currency imbalances,having only two reserve currencies the euro and us dollar.The significant imbalances by fixed currencies are entraining the problem....
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
There are lots of things to be understood by data and for which simple radiative concepts are not useful. My statement was in the context of understanding climate and not just ‘first principles’. ‘The...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Bart R
*sigh* I hate talking about foreigners’ internal problems. Always messed up in the most banal ways when looked into at any level of detail, and generally can be traced back to too much cheese. Henry...
View ArticleComment on Aerosols and Atlantic aberrations by Eric Ollivet
Evidence of correlation between T° variations and Solar Activity variations : <a...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Bart R
jerseykid | April 8, 2012 at 3:06 am | Can’t get the helium out of a balloon to make your voice all squeaky without opening a hole in it. Well, okay, technically helium seeps through balloons fast...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by jim
Yea, my brain’s in my head, and my feets’ in my shoes. And carts (calks) are in the horses’ shoes. I don’t blame you for any obsessions; I asked you thus to put you someplace on the map. You defend...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
So we are all agreed? Greenhouse gas molecules absorb photons and the resulting kinetic energy from bending and stretching bonds heats the atmosphere. More molecules absord more photons and the...
View ArticleComment on Meteorological March Madness by tomf0p
Come to think of it, if a windmill can’t pay for its keep in Wellington, where on earth can it?
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Peter Lang
It seems Bart R must have had a few too many Easter bunnies, of forgotten to take his tablets. He sure knows lots of nasty adjectives, and is clearly xenophobic as well. But appear to be innumerate....
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Captain Kangaroo
Scurilious nonsense from a disreputable partisan. http://henry-ergas.epik.com/bio
View ArticleComment on Aerosols and Atlantic aberrations by Paul S
AR4 chapter 7 contains a section which mostly concerns natural sources of aerosols. The study described in this post does what you ask to some extent. The model contains an interactive aerosol module...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by capt. dallas 0.8 +/-0.2
Well, that convection is the relief valve and the jet stream the mixer. In the general scope of things, that limited convection would be meaningless, but since a doubling of co2 is predicted to...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by peterdavies252
Louise queries the value of modelling the last 100 years and I am inclined to agree. While your enthusiasm is appreciated Girma I cant help feeling the you are out of your depth when you are attempting...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by David Springer
It’s not that scientists aren’t behaving like engineers. You don’t have be an engineer to not behave like third graders at the playground during recess. It definitely helps though! The big enabler is...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Louise
Peter – I don’t think of curve fitting as modelling. I think there is value in genuinely modelling the climate of the past 100 years* but not drawing pretty lines through some of the data and claiming...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by David Springer
No, it was a not a malicious lie. It was an inference. I said (in essence) “the greenhouse is limited to 278K” and you said “it is limited to 5500K”. This is analgous to me claiming that Venus’ (I know...
View ArticleComment on Lindzen et al.: response and parry by Jim2
Bart R | April 5, 2012 at 11:41 am | Reply “standards of welfare in city states” Yep, those standards were “You build this wall and we’ll give you a little bread and water, otherwise …”
View Article