Comment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Anteros
Paul S - I'm aware of the logarithmic nature of the climate response - that is why I specified a particular starting level - 400ppmv. 500 might be a better choice bit it doesn't matter much, as a rough...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by JCH
Well, as an ExxMob shareholder, I think a nice perk-rich, persecution-free office could be arranged somewhere in big oyl.
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Paul S
Anteros, Ah, I understand you now. Broadly I might agree though it depends on the timescales. I think, for example, societies (global and local) will be able to cope with a 5ºC warming over millenia...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Robert
The IPCC produces a series of reports summarizing the science. It’s neither a huge undertaking, nor is it very manpower-intense or expensive. The UN is somewhat more expensive and does more things....
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by DocMartyn
“Life can multiply until all the phosphorus is gone, and then there is an inexorable halt which nothing can prevent,” Isaac Asimov (Biochemist). Morocco, China, South Africa and Jordan control 80...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Robert
It’s an interesting question. Legally, you can give a microphone to anyone. Ethically, you probably have some responsibility for the message you are amplifying. On the other hand, Dr. Curry has...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by GaryM
If saying Joshua “stamps his pretty little foot” is homophobic, does that mean that when Joshua says that others are saying “Mommy, mommy he did it first…” he is pedophobic?
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Anteros
Paul S I agree with you about that. Many people still wouldn’t like the idea but changing the rate of warming by an order of magnitude (or even 2 or 3 times) would make adaptation very much easier. As...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Robert
Drivel. Phony statistics piled on top of lies by the Lysenkoist scum who call themselves “climate scientists”. Hysterical much? The denialist scum that call themselves “skeptics” seem quite touchy today.
View ArticleComment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by gbaikie
“You most certainly DO get an average of 5.38 kWh/day at Phoenix. This is simply the average amount of energy from the Sun over the whole year. This is similar in magnitude to the figures given in...
View ArticleComment on Emails by hunter
The irony of the believer tactic of asserting skeptics depend on conspiracy theories after climategate is rich.
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Robert
It’s the collectivist agenda you support Robert How is science “collectivist”? Do you feel that science oppresses your individuality in some way? Does my having integrity unfairly discriminate against...
View ArticleComment on McKitrick on the IPCC by hunter
Ross, The AGW apologists will do a lot of work to avoid dealing with what you wrote. BEST is simply a convenient prop for them to use as adistraction.
View ArticleComment on Emails by cwon14
“Hacker” is a point of bias. Odds are great there was never any hacking involved at all;...
View ArticleComment on Emails by Robert
Not really these records conflicted in the beginning . . . You don’t seem to understand the point. Which, sadly, is not surprising. What’s your science background? Maybe their account explains why they...
View ArticleComment on Emails by John
Ironically Robert had you actually read the emails you would have realised that it is you that are now the DENIER !!!
View ArticleComment on Emails by Rich Matarese
Returning to his fixation on corn farmers in Illinois, <b>bob droege</b> on November 28, 2011 at 4:17 PM perseverates: <blockquote>Alright, imagine if you will, what an Illinois...
View ArticleComment on Emails by Rich Matarese
Tsk. As usual, HTML in a “Leave a Reply” box, repent at leisure.
View ArticleComment on Slaying the Greenhouse Dragon. Part IV by Chris Ho-Stuart
The NASA data is as accurate as they can make it. The numbers are based on 22 year averages, I think from memory. The major variation is due to cloud, which is not a constant. I think you can download...
View ArticleClik here to view.
Comment on McKitrick on the IPCC by Anteros
Robert, you say – “the goal is to shift the definition of economically recoverable” I suspect you may be speaking for yourself. Because, I guess, you have the opposite goal of most sane, intelligent...
View Article